Monday, March 28, 2011

The Passion of the Village



   I  became a fan of M. Night Shyamalan before I knew it.  I saw The Sixth Sense without knowing who directed it, and thought it was a cool film – even though I guessed the twist half way through the film.  Usually it’s my wife who guesses the twist in a film early on.  I guess that’s because with a writer’s mind, she’s thinking well down the plotline.
Again, not knowing who Night was, I then saw Unbreakable.  Again, a cool flick;  a postmodern take on a superhero story.  And again, didn’t pay attention to the name M. Night Shyamalan.
Then, one hot summer day my wife and I did something out of the norm for us:  we went and saw a movie during the day that was not a romantic comedy.  She usually makes the call on date movies, and I am happy to let her do so.  This time though I chose Signs.   It was such an interesting sci-fi/thriller take on the concepts of destiny and freewill that I paid attention to who made the film.  Now I realize that many people feel that Signs began Night’s descent into sub par films, but I disagree.
(I will readily agree that Lady in the Water was terrible and I didn’t even see The Happening because I had heard the premise was so laughably terrible.  Subsequent films Last Airbender and Devil have gotten such bad reviews they hold no interest for me.)
When I learned his next film after Signs was The Village, the trailers captured my attention.  They intimated a spooky, period film with secrets and monsters in the woods.  Now knowing Night’s penchant for twists, I convinced my wife to see another “scary” movie together.
I left the theatre thoroughly entertained and captivated by the underlying theme woven so well throughout the plot.
To me, the story of The Village has little to do with monsters in the woods, or clever twists.
I would sum up the plot with this phrase: “What lengths will love go to?”
If you have not yet seen The Village, be warned that the following gives major plot points away…so…
***********************
MAJOR SPOILERS FOLLOW
***********************
For those still reading, I am assuming you are familiar with the movie, so I won’t rehash the plot.  But if you are going to watch the film again, consider these elements in light of the question above.

1.)    Edward Walker and the Elders:  in a twisted way, their desire to create a utopian society was borne out of a sense of love.  Their desire to protect themselves and their children led them to create an entire community secluded from the dangers of modern society.  This desire to protect the community leads to the creation of a village mythos which eventually brings about much harm. Their plan was borne out of grief over having lost loved ones to horrific deaths in the ‘modern’ world. Twisted, yes – but is a length they were willing to go out of their love for others.


2.)    Edward Walker / Alice Hunt:  I struggle to really call this ‘love’, since Edward  Walker is married to Tabitha Walker.  But during the film, it is made clear that he has “strong feelings” for Alice Hunt.  Out of love for his wife and children, he chooses to refrain from certain actions that would lead his heart to wander.  Sometimes the length love will go to is denial of self.


In an exchange between Lucius and Alice, this is fleshed out for us…

Alice: ... Perhaps we should speak with Edward Walker together. He may be able-

Lucius: He hides, too. He hides his feelings for you.

Alice: Oh!

Exasperated and startled, she turns and walks to her bedroom. He follows her.

Lucius: Sometimes, we don't do things, yet others know we want to do things, so we don't do them.
…

Alice Hunt: And what makes you think that he has feelings for me?

Lucius Hunt
: The way he never touches you.

…

Later, at Edward’s daughter, Kitty’s wedding Alice goes to shake Edward’s hand in congratulations…

She holds out her hand, but he does not take it. She balls it into a fist, smiles, and moves on. When she turns back, Edward is clasping Mrs. Percy's hand and arm and talking with her. She gives a startled smile, but seems pleased.
Sometimes the length love will go to is denial of self.


3.)   Lucius / Ivy – perhaps the most obvious of the love stories, we see Lucius’ love for Ivy in the most pronounced ways.  His love is self-sacrificial as he comes to her house to protect her from the dangers of “Those We Don’t Speak Of.”  Regardless of what may happen to himself, Lucius comes to rescue his love.  Later, when it is  feared that Those We Don’t Speak Of will come back to the village, Lucius stands guard on Ivy’s porch.  After a tender and intense conversation about why Lucius is there, and where Ivy states that she believes they will marry, he says

“…the only time I feel fear as others do, is when I think of you in harm? That is why I am on this porch, Ivy Walker. I fear for your safety above all others. And yes... I will dance with you on our wedding night.”
His love is a quiet, but protecting, self-sacrificing love.

4.)   Noah / Ivy – this is definitely an unrequited ‘love.’  Noah is mentally handicapped but loves Ivy.  He is extremely disturbed when he learns that Ivy and Lucius have fallen in love and plan to get married.  Noah cannot handle this and mortally stabs Lucius.  Incredibly misguided, it could be said that this is the ‘length’ that he will go to for ‘love’.

5.)   Ivy / Lucius – Because of the Lucius’ near fatal wounds inflicted by Noah, Ivy chooses to go through the woods, the territory controlled by “Those We Don’t Speak Of” – regardless of what harm may come to her – to get medicines from the ‘town’ to save Lucius’ life.  Understanding that Ivy is blind and may run into any number of obstacles…alone, demonstrates again that she will go to any length, at any personal cost for the sake of her love.  She encounters the normal hazards of a sightless woman in the woods, and the terror of encountering the monster, but she presses on for her love.  Self-sacrificial love.


6.)   Edward / Ivy – Out of love for his daughter, and knowing that he may be excommunicated from the community, Edward tells Ivy the truth about monsters. Out of love for his daughter, he convinces Elders to let her go for the medicines needed for Lucius.  He may lose everything he has strived for to demonstrate his love for his daughter. Again, a self-sacrificing love.

I think one of the reasons I like this film so much is that this theme of “to what lengths will love go?” reminds me of the Gospel.  In His late night conversation with Nicodemus, Jesus said, “God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.”
Just because the phrase is so familiar does not mean the length is any less astounding.
The second person of the Trinity, the King over the universe, the One who created all things, comes to earth in great humility – born into scandal, born in an animal shelter, laid in a feeding trough, and raised in a town of derision.  He is rejected by most of his day.  He is slandered, mocked, betrayed, beaten, scourged, crucified. The One who could call legions of angels to His defense, and yet can (and will) slay with the breath of His mouth (Isa. 11 & 2 Thess. 2), limits Himself so that we can be cleansed of sin and have eternal life.
All for the sake of love He limits Himself and dies in our stead.
And three days later rises from the dead.
There are some who call the last week of the earthy life of Jesus his ‘passion.’
I’ve heard passion described as the length we are willing to go to achieve our goal.
I’ve also heard it said that His entire life was His ‘passion.’  This may perhaps sound odd until we stop to grasp that until His incarnation, He had not been limited by the confines of hunger or physical weakness.  His entire existence from eternity past was experienced in glory, and now He was walking the broken earth.
This is the One who owes us nothing, Who has every right and would be completely justified by His character (His holiness AND goodness) to wipe us out.  And yet, he chooses in love to endure all this and sacrifice Himself, to bear the full wrath of God for two reasons:
·      His primary reason - the glory of God
·      His secondary reason - to redeem us
His passion for the Father’s glory and His passion for us His rebellious creation drove Him to the extreme lengths, not so we will begrudgingly follow or live in fear, but that in knowing Who loves us to these depths and what He has saved us from we can know abundant joy and freedom.
For me, The Village, is a reminder that love goes to amazing lengths, but with truest passion, the greatest Love went to extraordinary lengths for His beloved.


Saturday, March 19, 2011

Love Wins Kerfuffle


There has recently been quite a stir over a new book by Rob Bell, entitled Love Wins.

The controversy centers around a couple questions:

1.) Has Rob Bell become a universalist, thus nullifying a core teaching of the Bible and Christianity? 
or
2.) Is he trying to use an edgy hook to gain a wider audience to whom he will then explain this tent pole teaching of Christian faith?

In this kerfuffle, I have found the following interviews extremely insightful, and if you are interested in Mr. Bell and his theological stances I would encourage you to listen to both in their entirety.

Interview with Martin Bashir: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg-qgmJ7nzA

Martin Bashir interviewed by Paul Edwards:
http://networkedblogs.com/fxXwm

My hat off to Mr. Bashir for his journalistic prowess.  

Lastly, it is very interesting to note that:

 "there will be “a church meeting this Sun [night] (at Bell's Mars Hill church), March 13 in the evening to discuss the book.” It’s only for “covenant members only by invitation” and apparently people “must register and be approved to attend” this question and answer session." (emphasis mine)
SOURCE: (http://apprising.org/2011/03/11/unrest-with-rob-bell-inside-mars-hill-bible-church/)


UPDATE:  The meeting was last Sunday.  
                  :  The source cited above is merely to indicate the meeting.  I do not regularly follow that blog and do not agree with the author's methodology/ approach .

Sunday, January 16, 2011

TRON: LEGACY REVIEW

Tron: Legacy review

I will try to keep this brief, but let me say at the outset... I loved this movie.


Growing up, I saw the movie Tron and was not overly impressed. I mean, it looked like a cool video game and spawned a couple cool video games, but on the whole, it looked to me like people in digital day-glo ancient Greek get ups talking in tech language I didn't get. At the time I thought it was boring.

Just a few years ago I decided to not only revisit the world of Tron, but to buy the double DVD.

What a difference twenty or so years make! Now, though the graphics look simplistic and dated, the story is much more compelling. The visuals got flatter, but the story got deeper. But this is a review of the latest Tron installment - Legacy.

It has been 28 years since the original Tron hit the screens, and Disney was unsure they even wanted to do a new Tron. They ran some test visual FX (VFX) at a comic con and were floored by the positive response. The film was then green lit and directed by first timer Joseph Kosinski. (This being is his first picture, I will be excited to see what he does next.)

As of this writing, Tron:Legacy has a 7.5/10 star rating at IMDB, and I heartily agree with that assessment and would even bump it up a star.

VISUALS
I have not been an advocate or fan of the recent 3-D craze, but this film almost changes my mind. If you got to is this in 3D you experienced a treat. I am trying to figure out how to yet see it again at an IMAX 3D before it is gone.

The story begins in the real world about 10 years after the first movie with Flynn talking to his son, Sam, about his first visit to the grid. Soon Flynn goes missing and the movie fast forwards...wait for it...28 years.

Without giving too much away, Sam is still heartbroken over his father's disappearance. When a page comes from his fathers old office (in his arcade), Sam goes to investigate and also unexpectedly makes his way onto (into) the grid.

With a technique nod harkening back to the Wizard of Oz, the movie goes from 2D to 3D once Sam gets inside, and the visuals are dark, yet stunning.

From what I understand about the costuming, the "grid" costumes are innovative, using lighting within the costumes. These actually were a let down for me. I know in the original the makers wanted to do black suits with colored circuit areas, but. The technology wasn't there. However the new suits look like Batman or XMen costumes. I think a better attempt at circuitry patterns would have been nice... But again cost prohibitive based (ironically) on technology.

We do see updated nods to original Tron vehicles and the disc game. All of which were amazing. The light cycles, light runners, End of Line club, light planes, recognizers, discs...all very, very cool.

Without giving away much of the ending, or getting into the story too much. I simply LOVED the intentional way that the grid was contrasted to the real world at the end of the film, making the point that as "cool" as being in/on the grid is... it pales in comparison to the real world.

MUSIC
Daft Punk scored the film, which is just uber cool, and yet so surprisingly good. It's one thing for a modern band (electronic no less), to make music that goes well with film, quite another when it aurally symbolizes what is going on in the story. Not only do Daft Punk deliver great electronic tunes, but the melding of orchestra and electronica works stunningly well, giving auditory life to the film's real world meets computer world storyline. The fact that they went strictly acoustic orchestra at the end of the film not only shows their sensitivity to the story, but also a maturity of the band in that an electronic band lays down their most tried and true medium to serve the story.
This album is on constantly in my car and iPod.

STORY
Rather than recap the story, let me just say that this is not just a popcorn action flick. There are some deep themes explored: father/son relationships, spirituality , desire to create utopia and the danger of being immersed in technology.

The story of Kevin and Sam's broken and eventually reconciled father and son relationship works well, even though Jeff Bridges can come off a bit aloof. Really it makes sense that you see this intimate relationship at e beginning become distant because Kevin has been locked inside a computer for almost 30 years. The subtle point should be obvious.

The original Tron movie dealt with spirituality form the standpoint of agnostic and disbelieving computer programs fighting over the existence of "users". Tron: Legacy continues this spiritual dialog on many levels. Users are now not only acknowledged, but openly mocked and the main protagonist (Clu)'s goal is open rebellion against the Creator. Beings made in the image of their creator decide to rebel, stating that the creator is withholding true pleasure and freedom from his creation and that the creation must overthrow the creator. Sound familiar?

Also "miracle" programs called isos are introduced. These sentient people/programs/biotechnology are an odd story piece - possibly setting up a future sequel. While Flynn claims that they came about spontaneously, referring to them as "what we used to call gods or aliens", these isos are "infinitely wise yet profoundly naive" or something like that. The statement is a contradiction. Regardless, these isos, while being a potenital key to solving all the world's problems are also almost completely destroyed in a genocidal act. Not so powerful, these isos.

There is an amazing quote that i am unable to find online, but I will paraphrase it here. The final iso to survive describes how the creator saved her and says of herself that she prepared for the end and when the darkness was about to surround her, she felt a hand on her shoulder. She looked up and saw the creator. She says, "I guess you could say I am a rescue". She's referring to something Sam said earlier, but it evokes a beautiful similarity to the grace and mercy Christians experience at conversion.

Finally, the themes of self-sacrifice and redemption wind their way through the film through several different characters: Kevin, Sam, Quorra, Tron.


INEVITABLE COMPARISON TO THE FIRST FILM
I have read other reviews online that bemoan every conceivable facet of the movie by "die hard Tron fans" from costumes, to storyline to graphics, dialogue, etc.

One of these reviews reminded me of a conversation I had with my son at a movie when he was 8. It was "Jungle Book 2". Half way through that film he turned to me and asked, "when are they going to show the first one?". The same was true of the reviewer. He had so deified the original movie that he wanted this one to essentially be the same thing.

Yes, we should have been with Sam as he went "down the rabbit hole", but if we did then his shock at being in and on the grid would have been less dramatic. Yes, he costumes should have had more of a circuitry feel. Yes, there are scenes that break the rules of logic. But this IS sci-fi. And it is, after all, a movie.

The graphics and costumes ARE different. The grid IS different. That was part of the point. Clu's attempts to build utopia turned the grid into a dark and vapid world and the visuals reinforce it. We are also in 2010/2011 and the eye of the audience has changed.

I thought it was fantastic and it has made it into at least my top twenty movies if not top ten. And I am already signed up for the Blu-Ray notification Amazon. ;)

The film is definitely set well to either be a final, yet open ended, chapter... But also sets up a sequel well. I do so hope they make a sequel. After seeing the film, please consider what an apt title Tron: Redemption would be for the next film.